To help you decide if fluorocarbon is for you, we’ll discuss fluorocarbon in depth, assess its utility, and recommend the situations in which we think it shines. We’ll also provide reviews of some of our favorites.
Here's a quick glance of the best fluorocarbon fishing line on the market today:
|Seaguar Invizx||4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 25||Clear|
|Berkley Vanish||2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 17, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60||Clear|
|KastKing FluoroKote||4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 25, 30||Clear|
|P-Line Fluorocarbon||2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 25||Clear|
|Sunline Super FC Sniper||5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20||Clear|
|Trilene 100% Fluorocarbon||4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 25||Clear and Green|
Table of Contents (clickable)
Weights: 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 25
Seaguar Invizx has won a lot of anglers to its side, and just a few casts and knots will explain why. This is excellent fluorocarbon main line, and it’s our top choice when we need to spool up clear, sensitive, easy-casting fluoro.
Where Invizx shines is handling and knot strength. On a casting reel, this fluoro feels more like mono; supple, tangle-free, and frictionless. It casts really, really well as a result.
Its knot strength is simply unbeatable. With a well-tied Palomar, the main line may give before the knot lets go, defying a pretty hard and fast law of fishing! Seaguar must be doing some real magic behind the scenes, because this is better than even the best nylon monofilaments!
It’s also very sensitive, reinforcing why we recommend this excellent line for anglers looking to fish fluoro.
It stays clear during use, and we have no issues with the coating being shed.
If this line has a weakness, it’s poor abrasion resistance. Like all fluoros, we recommend you keep this out of the rough stuff. And it’s not available in heavy weights, so this is a limiting factor in saltwater.
Weights: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 17, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60
Berkley’s Vanish was one of the first fluorocarbon lines on the market, and at the time of its unveiling, many anglers were not aware of how to tie, condition, and treat fluoro. As a result, it became something of a whipping boy in the online fishing community. But it doesn’t deserve this reputation.
In fact, Vanish is an excellent fluorocarbon, and it’s surprisingly abrasion resistant. Don’t take our word for it: in SaltStrong’s testing, it outperformed the much more expensive Seaguar Blue Label in abrasion resistance. That’s a huge mark in its favor! Overall, we find Vanish to be about middle-of-the-pack in abrasion resistance, but a solid choice to be sure.
Produced in a huge range of weights, Vanish can find a place in your tackle box whether you fish crappie or tuna. We appreciate that diversity, and we know you will, too.
It casts well, but like most fluorocarbons, it can be a hassle on spinning gear. We recommend that you stick to casting reels with this line.
Vanish’s knot strength is average, too--roughly middle of the pack when tied properly. It remains clear during use, neither fading to white nor shedding its coating. And we find it reasonably sensitive as well.
Overall, Vanish is not our top choice, but it’s a solid option, nonetheless.
Weights: 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 25, 30
KastKing’s FluoroKote, as its name suggests, isn’t pure PVDF. Instead, it’s a copolymer line coated with 100% fluorocarbon to take advantage of the water refracting qualities of this material. That co-polymer core provides some advantages in terms of knot strength, casting, and handling, but it does offer a sacrifice in density.
As a result, it’s generally much less expensive than actual fluoro, and if you believe KastKing’s marketing, it’s just as sensitive. Our experience is that the good, pure fluorocarbons are more sensitive, which is the real strength of this type of line. That said, we’d say that this product is on par with Berkley Vanish in this category.
Knot strength is excellent, however, and a well-tied Palomar will hold.
Due to its composition, FluoroKote is a great handling line that’s exceptionally easy to cast. This is where it really stands out in our opinion. And it also features excellent abrasion resistance, making this a well-rounded choice for the budget-conscious.
Overall, FluoroKote is impressive, but it lacks the sensitivity of the true fluoros. That said, it’s still better than nylon monofilament on this front.
Weights: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 25
P-Line Flurorcarbon is an excellent choice, offering a great alternative to our top choice.
Indeed, if the poor abrasion resistance of Seaguar Invisx troubles you, this might be the option you look to. P-Line is definitely better suited to fishing rough conditions where abrasion will be a problem.
It’s also better than most fluorocarbons in terms of knot strength, but still trailing Invisx. That said, a properly-tied Palomar should deliver most of the line’s tensile rated test before giving. That’s roughly on par with the best of nylon monofilaments, and a leap above most of its competitors.
Castability and sensitivity are excellent as well, and we have no complaints in either department. It remains clear in use, too, making this an all-around excellent product.
Weights: 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 20
Sunline Super FC Sniper features a triple resin coating for improved limpness, handling, and abrasion resistance, and the result is a truly superior cast for fluorocarbon. It also gives this line very low memory, and we’d even think about running it on a spinning reel as a result. That’s saying something!
In use, Sunline’s FC Sniper shows great abrasion resistance and excellent sensitivity. It’s near the top of our reviews in both areas, making it an excellent choice.
It’s also easy handling and awesome when casting--probably the best of the bunch--making it useful on spinning reels, too!
If it has a weakness, it’s that its knot strength just isn’t as awesome as Seaguar InvisX or Trilene 100% Fluorocarbon, though it certainly casts just as well.
We saw no issues with fading.
In short, this is an excellent alternative to our top choice.
Weights: 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 20, 25
Colors: Clear and Green
Trilene’s 100% Fluorocarbon is made from a proprietary mix of PVDF, and according to Berkley, this imparts “optimal impact strength.” We like this line a lot, as its knot strength is excellent, and if you’re willing to trade a touch of sensitivity for landing more fish--and really, you should be!--this is a hard choice to beat.
When using a Palomar knot tied well, Trilene’s 100% Fluorocarbon exhibits incredible knot strength. In fact, it’s easily on par with the best nylon monofilaments, essentially negating a major criticism of fluoro. Whatever Trilene is doing to this fluorocarbon is working!
Abrasion resistance is pretty average for this kind of line, as is sensitivity, but it casts well and remains clear (and holds its green color) very well. But like most fluorocarbon lines, we recommend that you stick to casting reels. Its high memory and inclination to twist will create problems on spinning tackle.
Our sense is that when compared to other Berkley products like Vanish and Vanish Transition, this is the better choice, though it’s pretty much a similar jack-of-all-trades except when it comes to knot strength.
Fluorocarbon is a monofilament composed of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). Essentially a type of thermoplastic, it’s both harder and denser than nylon. In theory, this makes fluorocarbon--diameter for diameter--more abrasion resistant than standard mono. It also improves its sink rate and sensitivity.
High-quality fluorocarbon lines are multi-layered affairs, with a strong core to improve strength. They’re also usually coated to improve abrasion resistance, improving their handling and casting performance, too.
Waterproof - Fluorocarbon is completely waterproof. As a result, it won’t change its handling characteristics or weaken when wet. With the exception of knotting, it performs identically, wet or dry.
UV resistance - Your gear spends a lot of time in the sun, and that UV exposure is punishing to nylon monofilament. But fluoro is vastly more resistant to UV break-down than nylon, meaning that you can count on the fluoro to last longer without needing to be changed.
Sinks - Being much denser than water, unlike mono, fluorocarbon sinks. This is often given as a reason to switch to fluoro--but while true, its actual rate of descent is very, very slow. Take a look at this chart, for instance. Fluorocarbon takes a full 15 seconds to drop one foot!
As Mark Romanack of Precision Trolling explains, “the sink rate of fluorocarbon is so modest that it has next to zero impact on how deep a crankbait or other piece of trolling gear will dive.”
Sensitivity - That high density also gives fluorocarbon better sensitivity than mono, and this characteristic is further enhanced by its relative stiffness. It also provides exceptional slack line sensitivity--a huge feature for many bass anglers who fish bottom contact techniques.
In fact, this really is the strong suit of fluorocarbon, as it can perform like braid in this respect, without the high-visibility of a superline.
Low-visibility? - The primary selling point of fluorocarbon is its supposed near-invisibility in water. Indeed, its manufacturers and fans suggest that its low refractive index means that it’s nearly invisible to fish. Essentially, light is bent and slowed by fluoro much like it is in water, and the idea is that this makes it very hard to see.
An easy test of this property recommends that you dip clear fluorocarbon and mono of the same diameter in a glass of water; when compared side-by-side, the fluoro is generally the less visible.
Unfortunately, that’s not really the whole story. As fishing photographers report, mono and fluro are indistinguishable to their cameras.
Check out this video, with specific attention to 4:32. You’ll notice that you can’t tell the fluoro and mono apart in real conditions:
It’s also worth noting that scientists insist that fluoro is NOT nearly invisible in water. They’ve done the physics, and the answer is pretty clear: fluorocarbon isn’t what its manufacturers claim.
Still, it may make a difference in some situations and with some fish. In fact, when TackleTour tested Seaguar’s fluorocarbon in the real world, they found that it improved strike frequency with salmon, but that mono outperformed it on striped bass.
Rob Hughes summarizes our view pretty well. “Flouro [sic] is a brilliant material for a number of reasons, but assuming that it is invisible is a recipe for disaster.”
Low-stretch? - As fluoro fishermen know, the line stretches under load. Various brands stretch more or less, but generally speaking, fluorocarbon stretches more than mono, but it takes more load to force it to give in the first place. That said, unlike mono, it tends to retain that elongation, permanently deforming as a result.
Take a look at these charts:
As Berkley says, fluorocarbon “actually stretches more than nylon mono. The difference is, it takes a greater force to get fluoro stretching in the first place. As a result, fluoro makes a fine choice for situations where controlled stretch is helpful, whether as a mainline or a leader in conjunction with low-stretch superline.”
Rapala disagrees slightly, reaffirming the idea that brands matter. “Fluorocarbon does have less stretch (average 25%) than most nylon monofilaments (average 28%) but the difference is nearly [in]discernable by anglers until the nylon begins to absorb water and become more elastic.”
UV resistant - Don’t dump your discarded fluorocarbon in the water! Because it resists UV degradation, it’ll hang around for a long, long time.
Cost - Fluoro is expensive to manufacture, and that cost is passed down to consumers.
Hard to tie and low knot strength - If fluorocarbon has an Achilles’ heel, it’s knotting. Because its basic material is hard, it doesn’t bite well on itself, leading to both difficulty tying and poor knot strength.
In TackleTour’s testing, the high-end fluorocarbons they reviewed experienced knot failure at an average of 63.5 percent of their tested tensile strength. That means that for the average 20-pound fluorocarbon, knot failure will begin at just 12.7 pounds of force!
Which knots are best with fluoro? We recommend the Palomar.
This notwithstanding, there are excellent fluorocarbon lines that rival nylon monofilament in knot strength. This is unusual, and most do not.
Casts poorly - Fluoro’s stiffness is not helpful here, either, and it generally casts worse than both mono and braid. Moreover, because it’s exceptionally hard, it creates more guide friction.
Again, there are exceptions, and we review some really limp, easy casting fluoro among our favorites.
Not as abrasion resistant as people suggest -PVDF is amazingly tough material, and given that fluorocarbon is a round monofilament, it can take some abuse, sliding over abrasive surfaces.
But fluoro isn’t necessarily tougher than nylon mono, and manufacturers don’t say that it is. Instead, they suggest that because of its supposed “low visibility,” anglers can run heavier weight line, resulting in greater abrasion resistance simply because of increased diameter.
Careful testing hasn’t verified this supposed abrasion resistance, either.
Watch this video to see what we mean:
mono vs fluoro
Saltstrong then soaked the mono for 15 minutes and repeated the test with the same result.
Is this test definitive? No, but it’s food for thought, isn’t it?
And don’t take our word for it. Bobby Lane, 2008 Bassmaster Rookie of the Year, Elite Series champion and six-time Bassmaster Classic qualifier, has this to say: “If fluorocarbon has any disadvantages, it's that it sinks and may not be as abrasion-resistant as monofilament. That makes it a poor choice for floating lures. I also tend to use other line types when fishing really heavy cover where I expect my line to get nicked up.”
Deforms under load - The more a material stretches under load, the more “elastic” it is; how easily it then returns to its pre-load length is a question of “plasticity.”
Fluorocarbon is quite elastic, but not very plastic.
After a heavy load, fluorocarbon permanently deforms, retaining the stretch it was forced into to a maximum of about 5 percent.
Fluorocarbon has some unique strengths as main line, but it’s not ideal for every situation. As we note above, its true advantage as main line is that it’s quite sensitive, especially when slack, and still as invisible as mono. In short, think of fluoro as a braid replacement.
Fluorocarbon has unique strengths, but it also presents a set of challenging problems as main line. It’s stiff when compared to nylon monofilament or braid, and doesn’t handle or cast well. It knots poorly, too. And when it stretches under load, it can permanently deform, weakening the line further.
What do we do to overcome these weaknesses?
Though only a few companies manufacture the raw materials to make fluorocarbon line, quality varies from brand to brand. Here’s what we look for in a good choice.
Anglers switch to fluorocarbon when they need the sensitivity of braid in a low-vis situation, especially when they don’t trust leader to mainline knot strength. As a result, good fluorocarbon needs to be sensitive and knot well, since it’s going to be doing the work of both braid and nylon monofilament.
That’s why Seaguar’s Invisx is our top choice. Whatever Seaguar does at their factory is working, and this line exhibits knot strength that makes even mono jealous! It’s just incredible on this front, easily outstripping its competition. It’s also very sensitive and easy to cast, making it an ideal choice for many anglers.
It does have a weakness, however. It’s not terribly abrasion resistant, and if this worries you, P-Line Fluorocarbon or Sunline Super FC Sniper might be better options for you. But if you need very heavy weight fluoro, none of those options can deliver, and here we would turn to the otherwise jack-of-all-trades Vanish for these thicker diameter lines.
Whichever option you choose, if you follow our recommendations, you’ll find that fluoro gets the job done and then some!
Please leave a comment below if you think we’ve missed something in determining the best fluorocarbon line or if our discussion has helped you fish more successfully.